CRIME STORIES: POSNERIAN PRAGMATISM, RAWLSIAN PURE PROCEDURAL JUSTICE, AND THE FICTIONAL PROBLEM

JOHN R MORSS

Abstract


[There are many different ways in which law and truth may be said to be related. It is perhaps in the criminal trial that connections between them are of most signifi- cance. An orthodox way of describing a criminal trial is that the criminal procedure is seeking to establish the truth concerning some past event, and that success of the procedure is measured by how close its outcome converges with that truth. Crimi- nal justice presents the community with challenging dilemmas in this regard, such as those arising from the notion of double jeopardy. This paper discusses the Rawl- sian notions of ‘imperfect’, ‘perfect’ and ‘pure’ procedural justice, and suggests against Rawls that it is pure procedural justice that best represents what we want from a criminal justice system. Good procedure makes good criminal law. A com- parison is made with the writings of Habermas and Posner, and given that pure procedural justice eschews transcendental truths, some brief comments are made on the convergence of that position with the realm of the fictional.] 


Full Text:

PDF


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21153/dlr2004vol9no2art258

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


1835-9264

© Deakin University