Bringing Personas To Life: User Experience Design through Interactive Coupled Open Innovation

Lynn Coorevits, Dimitri Schuurman, Kathy Oelbrandt, Sara Logghe

Abstract


A frequently used technique to enable user involvement during the course of a software design project is the development of personas. Modeling personas helps developers to establish a stronger user focus and act as a constant reminder for whom one is and is not designing. Within this paper we propose coupled interactive open innovation through iterative user involvement, such as in a Living Lab approach, as a way to improve the effectiveness of personas and scenarios. Interactive coupled open innovation addresses user needs and creates new opportunities by using a trial-error learning process. This increases efficiency, augments stakeholders’ collaboration and facilitates co-creation. By involving real users who mirror the constructed personas in subsequent development steps, traditional persona development is enriched. This iterative process elicits new understandings and meanings of domain specific and market knowledge by positioning the development project in a ‘real-life’ context. The input of each step in the process translates towards and provides the technical team with potential input to develop iterations of the design. In this paper we provide a framework, based on interactive coupled open innovation, for persona development that will allow an optimized user experience by bringing personas and their scenarios to life in the design project.


Keywords


Living Labs; User Experience; Persona; Innovation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Chapman, C. N., and R. P. Milham. “The Personas’ New Clothes: Methodological and Practical Arguments against a Popular Method.” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 50.5 (2006): 634–636. Web.

Coenen, Tanguy, and Sarie Robijt. “Towards FALL: A Framework for Agile Living Lab Projects.” 2 (2015): n. pag. Print.

Dotan, Amir et al. “Designing with Only Four People in Mind? - A Case Study of Using Personas to Redesign a Work-Integrated Learning Support System.” HCI. N.p., 2009. 497–509. Web.

Dutilleul, Benoît, Frans a J Birrer, and Wouter Mensink. “Unpacking European Living Labs : Analysing Innovation ’ S Social Dimensions.” Central European Journal of Public Policy 4 (2010): 60–85. Web.

Eriksson, Mats, Veli-pekka Niitamo, and Seija Kulkki. State-of-the-Art in Utilizing Living Labs Approach to User- Centric ICT Innovation - a European Approach. Sweden: N.p., 2005. Print.

Floyd, Ingbert R., M. Cameron Jones, and Michael B. Twidale. “Resolving Incommensurable Debates: A Preliminary Identification of Persona Kinds, Attributes, and Characteristics.” Artifact 2.1 (2008): 12–26. Web.

Fowler, Martin, and Jim Highsmith. “The Agile Manifesto.” Software Development 9.August (2001): 28–35. Web.

Grudin, Jonathan, and John Pruitt. “Personas . Participatory Design and Product Development: An Infrastructure for Engagement.” Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference. Palo Alto: N.p., 2002. 144–152. Web.

iMinds. digiMeter: Adoption and Usage of Media & ICT in Flanders. N.p., 2013. Print.

Johansson, Martin, and Jörn Messeter. “Present-Ing the User: Constructing the Persona.” Digital Creativity 16.4 (2005): 231–243. Web.

Jolliffe, Ian. Principal component analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2002.

Long, Frank. “Real or Imaginary: The Effectiveness of Using Personas in Product Design.” Proceedings of the Irish Ergonomics Society Annual Conference. N.p., 2009. 1–10. Print.

Markensten, E., and H. Artman. “Procuring a Usable System Using Unemployed Personas.” ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. Vol. 82. N.p., 2004. 13–22. Web.

Matthews, Tara, Tejinder Judge, and Steve Whittaker. “How Do Designers and User Experience Professional Actually Perceive and Use Personas?” Conference of Human Factors in Computing Systems. Austin, Texas: N.p., 2012. 1219–1228. Web.

McGinn, Jennifer Jen, and Nalini Kotamraju. “Data-Driven Persona Development.” Proceeding of the twentysixth annual CHI conference on Human factors in computing systems CHI 08 (2008): 1521. Web. CHI ’08.

Paul, A. Updates on Scenario and Use Cases. N.p., 2012. Web.

Pierson, Jo, and Bram Lievens. “Configuring Living Labs for a ‘Thick’ Understanding of Innovation.” Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference. Vol. 1. Redmond, WA: N.p., 2005. 114–127. Print.

Piller, Frank, and Joel West. “Firms, Users, and Innovation: An Interactive Model of Coupled Open Innovation.” New Frontiers in Open Innovation. N.p., 2014. 1–33. Print.

Pruitt, John, and Jonathan Grudin. “Personas: Theory and Practice.” Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Designing for User Experiences - DUX ’03. N.p., 2003. 1. Web.

Pruitt, John S., Tamara Adlin, and Whitney Quesenbery. The Persona Lifecycle. N.p., 2006. Web.

Sanders, Elizabeth B, and Pieter Jan Stappers. “Co-Creation and the New Landscapes of Design.” CoDesign 4.1 (2008): 5–18. Print.

Sauer, Sabrina. “User Innovativeness in Living Laboratories: Everyday User Improvisations with ICTs as a Source of Innovation.” Universiteit Twente, 2013. Web.

Schuurman, Dimitri. “Bridging the Gap between Open and User Innovation? Exploring the Value of Living Labs as a Means to Structure User Contribution and Manage Distributed Innovation.” UGent/VUB, 2015. Print.

Sein, Maung K et al. “Action Design Research.” MIS Quarterly 35 (2011): 37–56. Print.

Sinha, Rashmi. “Persona Development for Information-Rich Domains.” CHI ’03: CHI '03 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (2003): 830–831. Web.

Sutherland, Jeff. Scrum Handbook. N.p., 2010. Web.

Trimi, Silvana, and Jasmina Berbegal-Mirabent. “Business Model Innovation in Entrepreneurship.” International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 8.4 (2012): 449–465. Web. 11 Nov. 2013.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21153/ps2016vol2no1art534

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License | ISSN 2205-5258