‘You Can’t Say No to the Beauty and the Beast’: Shrek and Ideology

Authors

  • Maria Takolander
  • David McCooey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21153/pecl2005vol15no1art1255

Keywords:

masculinity, Shrek, films, feminism

Abstract

The film 'Shrek' is considered with a reflection on the discourses of post-feminism, which announce the redundancy of the feminist enterprise in a brave new world where girls and women have allegedly gone very far in achieving equality of opportunities and access to power. A number of suggestions for scrutinising this film are also suggested, as it has received some critical attention, despite the fact that it has also enjoyed enormous commercial success since its release.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Ansen, d. 2001, ‘A shrek of a summer’, Newsweek May 7, p. 62.

Bakhtin, M. 1994, ‘Carnival Ambivalence’, The Bakhtin Reader: Selected Writings of Bakhtin, Medvedev and Voloshinov, ed. Pam Morris, trans. Helene iswolsky, Arnold, London, pp. 194-244.

Bowie, d. 1991, ‘Beauty and the Beast’, “Heroes” (1977), audio Cd, eMi, CdP 79 7720 2.

de Lauretis, t. 1984, Alice Doesn’t: Feminism, Semiotics, Cinema, Macmillan, London.

Eco, U. 1984, ‘the Frame of Comic Freedom’, Carnival! ed. thomas A. sebeok, Mouton, Berlin.

Halberstam, J. 2002, ‘the good, the bad, and the ugly: Men, women, and masculinity’, in Masculinity Studies and Feminist Theory: New Directions, ed. J.K. Gardiner, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 344-67.

Hanke, r. 1992, ‘redesigning men: Hegemonic masculinity in transition’, in Men, Masculinity and the Media, ed. s. Craig, sage, Newbury Park (CA), pp. 185-98.

Hopkins, J. 2004, Shrek: From the Swamp to the Screen, Harry N. Abrams, New York.

James, K. 2002, ‘Crossing the boundaries: scatology, taboo and the carnivalesque in the picture book’, Papers, vol. 12.3: 19-27.

Johnson, A. 1997, The Gender Knot: Unravelling Our Patriarchal Legacy, temple University Press, Philadelphia.

Lieberman, M. 1986, ‘“some day my prince will come”: Female acculturation through the fairytale’, in Don’t Bet on the Prince, ed. J. Zipes, Methuen, New York, pp. 185-98.

Mifflin, M (2001), ‘“Shrek” is not Shrek!’, Salon. com. UrL.

Neff, H. 1996, ‘strange faces in the mirror: the ethics of diversity in children’s films’, The Lion and the Unicorn, 20.1: 50-56.

Sawyer, M., 2004, ‘Worth the Wait’ (review), New Statesman July 5, p. 46.

Sedgwick, e.K. 1985, Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire, Columbia University Press, New York.

Steig, W. 1990, Shrek!, Farrar straus Giroux, New York.

Stephens, J. 1992, Language and Ideology in Children’s Fiction, Longman, London.

Summers, A. 2003, The End of Equality: Work, Babies and Women’s Choices in Twenty-First Century Australia, random House, Milson’s Point.

Downloads

Published

2005-01-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

“‘You Can’t Say No to the Beauty and the Beast’: Shrek and Ideology” (2005) Papers: Explorations into Children’s Literature, 15(1), pp. 5–14. doi:10.21153/pecl2005vol15no1art1255.

Similar Articles

11-20 of 26

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.