De-Colonising Shakespeare?: Agency and (Masculine) Authority in Gregory Rogers’s The Boy, The Bear, The Baron, The Bard

Authors

  • Erica Hateley Queensland University of Technology, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21153/pecl2009vol19no1art1158

Keywords:

Edward Said, William Shakespeare, discourse, Gregory Rogers, The Boy, The Bear, The Baron, The Bard, colonisation, decolonisation

Abstract

Although Said is writing about literal geographies here as well as cultural mappings of them, I open with his claims in order to initiate my consideration of the ways in which 'Shakespeare' as a discourse (Freedman 1989, p.245) and Shakespeare's historical and geographical contexts have been made over into culturally-contested terrain within contemporary children's literature for the purposes of constructing and controlling social space and subjectivities. Historically, both the discourse of 'Shakespeare' and the depiction of William Shakespeare as a character have been deployed as structuring logics for narratives about the inherent value of Shakespeare, and in turn, for discussions of not just the legitimacy but the necessity of young people's subordination of self to Shakespeare. Gregory Rogers's 'The Boy, The Bear, The Baron, The Bard' (2004) not only participates in that tradition of children's literature which deploys Shakespeare as a colonising discourse but also disrupts the norms of the tradition in two important ways.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

  • Erica Hateley, Queensland University of Technology, Australia

    Erica Hateley is a lecturer in the School of Cultural and Language Studies in Education at Queensland University of Technology. She is the author of Shakespeare in Children’ s Literature: Gender and Cultural Capital (Routledge, 2009).

References

Abercrombie, N, Lash, S & Longhurst, B (1992) ‘Popular representation: recasting realism’, in S. Lash & J. Friedman (eds) Modernity and Identity. Oxford, Blackwell, pp.115-140.

Blackwood, G (1998) The Shakespeare Stealer. New York, Dutton Children’s Books.

Blackwood, G (2000) Shakespeare’ s Scribe. New York, Dutton Children’s Books.

Blackwood, G (2003) Shakespeare’ s Spy. New York, Dutton Children’s Books.

Bottoms, J (2000) ‘Familiar Shakespeare’, in E. Bearne & V. Watson (eds) Where Texts and Children Meet. London, Routledge, pp.11-25.

Burt, R (1998) Unspeakable ShaXXXspeares: Queer Theory & American Kiddie Culture. New York, St. Martin’s.

Cheaney, J. B. (2000) The Playmaker. New York, Dell Yearling.

Cheaney, JB (2002) The True Prince. New York, Dell Yearling.

Chedgzoy, K (2007) ‘Shakespeare in the company of boys’, in S. Greenhalgh, R. Shaughnessy & K. Chedgzoy (eds) Shakespeare and Childhood. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp.184-200.

Freedman, B (1989) ‘Misrecognizing Shakespeare’, in N. Holland, S. Homan & B. Paris (eds) Shakespeare’ s Personality. Berkeley, University of California Press, pp.244-260.

Frye, S (1992) ‘The myth of Elizabeth at Tilbury’, Sixteenth Century Journal 23, 1: 95-114.

Lanier, D (2002) Shakespeare and Modern Popular Culture. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Loomba, A. & M. Orkin, M (1998) ‘Introduction: Shakespeare and the post-colonial question’, in A. Loomba & M. Orkin (eds) Post-Colonial Shakespeares. London, Routledge, pp.1-19.

McGillis, R (2000) ‘And the Celt knew the Indian’: Knowingness, postcolonialism, children’s literature’, in R. McGillis (ed) Voices of the Other: Children’ s Literature and the Postcolonial Context. New York, Routledge, pp.223-236.

Moebius, W (1986) ‘Introduction to picturebook codes’, Word & Image 2, 2: 141-158.

Nikolajeva, M. (2003) ‘Verbal and visual literacy: The role of picturebooks in the reading experience of young children’, in N. Hall, J. Lawson & J Marsh (eds) Handbook of Early Childhood Literacy. London, SAGE, pp.235-248.

Nodelman, P. (1988) Words About Pictures: The Narrative Art of Children’ s Picture Books. Athens, University of Georgia Press.

Parsons, E. (2004) ‘Starring in the intimate space: Picture book narratives and performance semiotics’, Image & Narrative 9 <http://www.imageandnarrative.be/performance/parsons.htm>.

Rogers, G. (2004) The Boy, The Bear, The Baron, The Bard. Crows Nest, NSW, Allen & Unwin.

Said, E. (1994) Culture and Imperialism. New York, Vintage.

Stevenson, D (2004) ‘The boy, the bear, the baron, the bard’, Bulletin of the Center for Children’ s Books 58, 4: 182-183.

Trease, G (2002) Cue for Treason. Harmondsworth, Puffin.

Williams, M. (1998) Mr. William Shakespeare’ s Plays. London, Walker Books.

Williams, M (2000) Bravo, Mr. William Shakespeare! Cambridge, MA, Candlewick.

Zabus, C (1985) ‘A Calibanic tempest in anglophone and francophone new world writing’, Canadian Literature 104: 35-50.

Downloads

Published

2009-01-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

“De-Colonising Shakespeare?: Agency and (Masculine) Authority in Gregory Rogers’s The Boy, The Bear, The Baron, The Bard” (2009) Papers: Explorations into Children’s Literature, 19(1), pp. 59–68. doi:10.21153/pecl2009vol19no1art1158.

Similar Articles

21-30 of 38

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.