The invisible architecture of care: Feminist leadership and systems transformation in humanitarian response
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21153/thl2026art2417Keywords:
Care, femininism, systems transformation, leadership, communityAbstract
In a time of escalating crises, rising authoritarianism, and erosion of global solidarity, this paper argues that humanitarian response can be reimagined through the lens of care. Drawing from feminist leadership theory and field-based insights, this paper proposes care as a core principle of humanitarian preparedness and response, not a secondary or sentimental value. It contends that women's community-based networks—grounded in co-creation, collective design, and knowledge of safety and need—already embody a practical form of systems transformation often overlooked by formal humanitarian structures. Through a feminist lens, "care" is reframed as both method and power: an organising principle that dissolves hierarchies, strengthens social cohesion, and restores humanity in leadership. The paper calls for humanitarian organisations to recognise care as operational strategy, epistemology, and ethical infrastructure in times of crisis. Integrating care as a guiding principle of humanitarian system design implies strategic shifts: from coordination to co-creation, from compliance-based models to those grounded in trust and adaptive capacity, and from procedural efficiency to relational ethics. The paper argues that the invisible architecture of care already offers a living blueprint for systems transformation—the challenge for humanitarian leadership is to make it visible, valuable, and central.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. Routledge.
Austin, J. L., & Leander, A. (2023). Making international things: Designing world politics differently. Global Studies Quarterly, 3(4), ksad068.
ActionAid. (2013). ActionAid's ten principles of feminist leadership. ActionAid International.
ActionAid. (2026). Women's humanitarian leadership fund: Lessons on power, trust and impact. ActionAid International. ALNAP. (2024). The state of the humanitarian system. ALNAP/ODI.
Baines, E., & Paddon, E. (2012). "This is how we survived": Civilian agency and humanitarian protection. Security Dialogue, 43(6), 231–247.
Barnett, M. (2011). Empire of humanity: A history of humanitarianism. Cornell University Press.
Barnett, M., & Weiss, T. G. (Eds.). (2011). Humanitarianism contested: Where angels fear to tread. Routledge.
Batliwala, S. (2011). Feminist leadership for social transformation: Clearing the conceptual cloud. CREA.
Butler, J. (2004). Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. Verso.
Centre for Humanitarian Leadership. (2023). Research pillars: Humanitarian leadership and systems transformation. Centre for Humanitarian Leadership.
CHS Alliance. (2022). Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability. CHS Alliance.
Crossan, M., Seijts, G., & Gandz, J. (2021). Why humility is vital to effective humanitarian aid leadership. Disasters, 45(4), 1–18.
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
Dabrowski, V. (2021). 'Neoliberal feminism': Legitimising the gendered moral project of austerity. Sociology, 55(1), 89–105. Democracy International. (2019). South Sudan: Gender analysis of the peace agreement. Democracy International.
Development Initiatives. (2025). Global humanitarian assistance report 2025. Development Initiatives.
Duffield, M. (2007). Development, security and unending war: Governing the world of peoples. Polity Press.
Elrha. (2021). Gap analysis of gender-based violence in humanitarian settings. Elrha.
Fassin, D. (2012). Humanitarian reason: A moral history of the present. University of California Press.
Feminist Humanitarian Network. (2024). Still holding the line: Feminist humanitarian action during crisis and austerity. Feminist Humanitarian Network.
Folbre, N. (2001). The invisible heart: Economics and family values. New Press.
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.
GBV AoR/GBV Guidelines. (2018). Lighting, WASH and gender-based violence in camp settings: A literature review. GBV AoR.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Harvard University Press.
Global Protection Cluster. (2022). IASC gender handbook for humanitarian action: Women, girls, boys and men (2nd ed.). Global Protection Cluster.
Haas, P. (1992). Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.
Heifetz, R. A., Grashow, A., & Linsky, M. (2009). The practice of adaptive leadership: Tools and tactics for changing your organization and the world. Harvard Business Press.
Held, V. (2006). The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. Oxford University Press.
Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press.
Humanitarian Leadership Academy. (2025). Humanity, dignity, agency: A call for shifts in humanitarian leadership in protracted crises. Humanitarian Leadership Academy.
Hyndman, J. (2010). The question of "the political" in critical geopolitics: Querying the "child soldier" in the "war on terror." Political Geography, 29(5), 247–255.
ICAN Peacework. (2024). The role of women in shaping post-war South Sudan. ICAN.
IASC. (2016). The IASC policy on protection in humanitarian action. Inter-Agency Standing Committee.
IASC. (2017). Gender handbook for humanitarian action: Women, girls, boys and men. Inter-Agency Standing Committee.
Kunz, R., Thompson, H., & Prügl, E. (2019). Gender expertise in global governance: Contesting the boundaries of a field. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 2(1), 23–40.
Leander, A. (2016). Strong objectivity in security studies: Ethnographic contributions to method development. International Studies Perspectives, 17(4), 462–475.
Lokot, M. (2020). Unequal and invisible: A feminist political economy approach to valuing women's care labor in the COVID-19 response. Frontiers in Sociology, 5, 1–9.
Lokot, M. (2021). Whose voices? Positionality and intersectionality in humanitarian research. Disasters, 45(1), 1–15.
Lowy Institute. (2026). Mainstreamed but sidelined: Global funding for gender equality. Lowy Institute.
Lugones, M. (2010). Toward a decolonial feminism. Hypatia, 25(4), 742–759.
Merry, S. E. (2011). Measuring the world: Indicators, human rights, and global governance. Current Anthropology, 52(S3), 83–95.
Mohanty, C. T. (2003). Feminism without borders: Decolonizing theory, practicing solidarity. Duke University Press.
OCHA. (2025). Global humanitarian overview 2025. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs.
ODI/HPN. (2022). Making space for community-based protection in the humanitarian protection landscape. Humanitarian Exchange, 80. ODI.
Olivius, E., & Ny, A. (2019). Feminism in the humanitarian machine: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Humanitarian Affairs, 1(3), 2–7.
Oxfam. (2022). Not all gaps are created equal: The true value of care work. Oxfam International.
Oxfam. (2025). A more feminist approach to principled humanitarian aid. Oxfam International.
Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford University Press.
Prügl, E. (2015). Neoliberalising feminism. New Political Economy, 20(4), 614–631.
Prügl, E. (2016). Neoliberalism with a feminist face: Crafting a new hegemony at the World Bank. Feminist Economics, 23(1), 30–53.
Prügl, E. (2020). Feminist methodology between theory and praxis. Review of International Studies, 46(3), 304–314. Publish What You Fund. (2026). Metrics matter III: Counting local. Publish What You Fund.
Ramalingam, B. (2013). Aid on the edge of chaos: Rethinking international cooperation in a complex world. Oxford University Press.
SDDirect. (2024). Guidance note: Applying feminist approaches to humanitarian action. SDDirect.
Shore, C., & Wright, S. (Eds.). (2015). Audit culture: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics, and the academy. Routledge.
Solferino Academy & IFRC. (2023). Humanitarian leadership for the future. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies.
Sphere Association. (2018). The Sphere Handbook: Humanitarian charter and minimum standards in humanitarian response. Sphere.
Starhawk. (1990). Truth or dare: Encounters with power, authority, and mystery. HarperOne.
Tickner, J. A., & Prügl, E. (2018). Feminist IR: Research agendas for a world in transition. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 1(1), 75–91.
Traglia, F. P. (2018). Non-confrontational human rights advocacy in authoritarian Southeast Asia. In J. Gomez & R. Ramcharan (Eds.), The universal periodic review of Southeast Asia. Palgrave Macmillan.
Traglia, F. P. (2020). From transition to government accountability: Opportunities for the Myanmar National Human Rights Commission. In J. Gomez & R. Ramcharan (Eds.), National human rights institutions in Southeast Asia. Palgrave Macmillan.
Traglia, F. P. (2024). The invisible architecture of care [TEDx talk]. TEDx [https://youtu.be/S5Jtwp_Mk6A?si=yhjGa42Ley-8t3MyL ].
Traglia, F. P. (2026). Designing gender justice: Material politics, expertise, and localisation in transformative humanitarian response (PhD research concept note). Graduate Institute Geneva.
Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. Routledge.
Tronto, J. C. (2013). Caring democracy: Markets, equality, and justice. New York University Press.
True, J. (2012). The political economy of violence against women. Oxford University Press.
True, J., & Tanyag, M. (2017). The gendered crisis: Women's unpaid work and cheap labour as a non-traditional security threat. In Gender, peace and security. Routledge.
UNHCR. (2023). Jordan: Community-based protection dashboard. UNHCR Operational Data Portal. https://data.unhcr.org
UNHCR. (2025). Global trends: Forced displacement in 2024. UNHCR.
UNHCR/Blumont. (2019). Zaatari refugee camp operational data: Community-based protection. UNHCR Operational Data Portal.
UN Women. (2022). Pakistan floods: Gender-responsive humanitarian response. UN Women.
Women Peace Network – Arakan. (2016). Submission to the CEDAW Committee. OHCHR.
Women's Peace and Humanitarian Fund. (2025). South Sudan programming — Women-led protection and peacebuilding initiatives. WPHF. https://wphfund.org/countries/south-sudan/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
How to Cite
