Work readiness in graduate recruitment and selection: A review of current assessment methods
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21153/jtlge2010vol1no1art546Keywords:
work readiness, graduate employability, graduate recruitment, graduate selection, graduate assessment, transferable skills, graduate competenciesAbstract
Graduate recruitment and selection differs from other contexts in that graduate applicants generally lack job-related experience. Recent research has highlighted that employers are placing increasing value on graduates being work ready. Work readiness is believed to be indicative of graduate potential in terms of long term job performance and career advancement. A review of the literature has found that current graduate recruitment and selection practices lack the rigour and construct validity to effectively assess work readiness. In addition, the variety of interchangeable terms and definitions articulated by employers and academics on what constitutes work readiness suggests the need to further refine this construct. This paper argues that work readiness is an important selection criterion, and should be examined systematically in the graduate assessment process, as a construct in itself. The ineffectiveness of current assessment methods in being able to measure work readiness supports the need to develop a specific measure of work readiness that will allow more effective decision practices and potentially predict long term job capacity and performance.
Metrics
References
ACNielsen Research Services (2000). Employer satisfaction with graduate skills: Research report by Evaluations and Investigations Programme, Higher Education Division. Canberra, ACT: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
Atlay, M., & Harris, R. (2000). An institutional approach to developing students' 'transferable' skills. Innovations in Education and Training International, 37(1), 76-84.
Bottjen, A. (2001). The benefits of college recruiting. Sales and Marketing Management, 153, 12.
Carless, S. A. (2007). Graduate recruitment and selection in Australia. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15(2), 153-166.
Casner-Lotto, J., Barrington, L. & Wright, M. (2006). Are they really ready to work? Employers' perspectives on the basic knowledge and applied skills of new entrants to the 21st century U.S. workforce. (Research Report BED-06-Workforce). Washington DC, USA: The Conference Board, Inc., the Partnership for 21st Century Skills, Corporate Voices for Working Families, and the Society for Human Resources Management.
Gabb, A. (1997). University challenge. Management Today, (December 1997), 62-64.
Gardner, P. D., & Liu, W.-Y. (1997). Prepared to perform? Employers rate work force readiness of new grads. Journal of Career Planning & Employment, 57(3), 32-56.
Gatewood, R. D., Feild, H. S., & Barrick, M. (2008). Human resource selection (6th ed.). Mason, Ohio: Thomson Higher Education.
Ghiselli, E. E. (1973). The validity of aptitude tests in personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 26(4), 461-477. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1973.tb01150.x
Hager, P. (2006). Nature and development of generic attributes. In P. Hager & S. Holland (Eds.), Graduate attributes, learning and employability. The Netherlands: Springer.
Hager, P., & Holland, S. (2006). Introduction. In P. Hager & S. Holland (Eds.), Graduate attributes, learning and employability. The Netherlands: Springer.
Hambur, S., Rowe, K., & Luc, L. T. (2002). Graduate skills assessment: Stage one validity study. Canberra, ACT: The Australian Council for Educational Research (Ed.), Commonwealth Department of Education, Science and Training.
Hart, P. D. (2008). How should colleges assess and improve student learning? Employers' views on the accountability challenge, A survey of employers conducted on behalf of: The Association of American Colleges and Universities. Washington, DC: Peter D. Hart Research Associates, Inc.
Hodgkinson, G. P., & Payne, R. L. (1998). Graduate selection in three European countries. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 71(4), 359-365.
Hoopis, H. P. (1994). The old college try: How to recruit outstanding college students. Manager's magazine, 69, 16-23.
Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press.
Keenan, T. (1995). Graduate recruitment in Britain: A survey of selection methods used by organizations. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 16(4), 303-317.
Knight, P.T., & Yorke, M. (2003). Assessment, learning and employability. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education
McIntire, S. A., & Miller, L. A. (2007). Foundations of psychological testing: A practical approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Topolnytsky, L. (1998). Commitment in a changing world of work. Canadian Psychology, 39(1-2), 83-93. doi:10.1016/S0708-5591(02)00190-5
Murphy, K. R. (2004). Assessment in work settings. In M. Hersen (Ed.), Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment (Vol. 3). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Nicholson, N., & Arnold, J. (1991). From expectation to experience: Graduates entering a large corporation. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 12(5), 413-429. doi: 10.1002/job.4030120506
O'Leary, B. S., Lindholm, M. L., Whitford, R. A., & Freeman, S. E. (2002). Selecting the best and brightest: Leveraging human capital. Human Resource Management, 41(3), 325340.
Payne, J. (2000). The unbearable lightness of skill: The changing meaning of skill in UK policy discourses and some implications for education and training. Journal of Education Policy, 15(3), 353-369.
Roth, P. L., BeVier, C. A., Switzer, F. S., & Schipmann, J. S. (1996). Meta-analyzing the relationship between grades and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(5), 548-556.
Roth, P. L., & Bobko, P. (2000). College grade point average as a personnel selection device: Ethnic group differences and potential adverse impact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 399-406.
Rynes, S. L., Orlitzky, M. O., & Bretz Jr, R. D. (1997). Experienced hiring versus college recruiting: Practices and emerging trends. Personnel Psychology, 50(2), 309-339. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00910.x
Salgado, J. F. (1999). Personnel selection methods. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International Review of Industrial & Organizational Psychology, Vol 14, 1999. New York: Wiley.
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262-274.
Slaughter, J. E., Stanton, J. M., Mohr, D. C., & Schoel, W.A. (2005). The interaction of attraction and selection: Implications for college recruitment and Schneider's ASA model. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(4), 419-441.
Stewart, J., & Knowles, V. (1999). The changing nature of graduate careers. Career Development International, 4(7), 370-383.
Stewart, J., & Knowles, V. (2000). Graduate recruitment and selection practices in small businesses. Career Development International, 5(1), 21-38. doi: 10.1108/13620430010309332
Taylor, A. (2005). What employers look for: The skills debate and the fit with youth perceptions. Journal of Education and Work, 18(2), 201-218.
Terpstra, D. E., & Rozell, E. J. (1993). The relationship of staffing practices to organizational level measures of performance. Personnel Psychology, 46(1), 27-48.
Trank, C.Q., Rynes, S.L. & Bretz Jr., R.D. (2002). Attracting applicants in the war for talent: Differences in work preferences among high achievers. Journal of Business and Psychology, 16 (3), 331 – 345.
Weisner, W. H., & Cronshaw, S. F. (1988). A meta-analytic investigation of the impact of interview format and degree of structure on the validity of the employment interview. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61(1988), 275-290.
Wright, P. M., Lichenfels, P. A., & Pursell, E. D. (1989). The structured interview: Additional studies and a meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 62(3), 191-199.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
How to Cite
