Private Self in Celebrification Processes
Discursive Patterns of Self-Subjugation, Self-Segmentation and Self-Demotion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21153/psj2026vol12no1art2288Keywords:
Public Persona, Private Self, Interpersonal Communication, Dialogic Self, Relational Dialectics, CelebrificationAbstract
In celebrification—the production of a celebrity identity—the public persona occupies a central position, but little is known about how the private self is sustained. This study examines how music artists negotiate their private selves interpersonally during celebrification through meaning-making processes, drawing on relational dialectics theory. Interviews were conducted with 17 Finnish music artists, and contrapuntal discourse analysis was employed to identify and interpret the discursive patterns and meanings that emerged in these negotiations. The findings reveal three patterns: self-subjugation, which suppresses the private self in favour of the public persona and external expectations; self-demotion, which downplays the public persona and fosters egalitarian interaction and personal disclosure; and self-segmentation, which compartmentalises private and public selves across relational contexts. Self-subjugation represents a shift towards a monologic self and associated interpersonal challenges, whereas self-demotion and self-segmentation reflect a dialogic self that creates space for the private self. Together, these patterns underscore the centrality of interpersonal communication in self-negotiation, where the private self is sustained through individual agency, contextual boundaries, relational symmetry and regulated self-disclosure. This study advances understanding of the communicative patterns that underpin the relational and personal wellbeing of artists and other celebrity practitioners in domains reliant on public persona construction. The findings contribute to persona studies by illuminating the conceptual interdependence of private and public selves. Practical implications include strategies for sustaining the private self in increasingly public social environments.
Downloads
References
Adler, PA & Adler, P 1989, ‘The gloried self: The aggrandizement and the constriction of self’, Social Psychology Quarterly, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 299–310.
Altman, I & Taylor, DA 1973, Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships, Rinehart & Winston, New York.
Archer, A & Robb, CM 2023, ‘Being a celebrity: Alienation, integrity, and the uncanny’, Journal of the American Philosophical Association, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 597–615.
Bakhtin, M 1981, ‘Discourse in the novel’, in M Holquist (ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin, University of Texas Press, Austin, pp. 259–422.
Bakhtin, M 1984, Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics, C Emerson (ed.), University of Minnesota Press, Minnesota.
Baxter, L 2011, Voicing relationships: A dialogic perspective, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks.
Baxter, L & Montgomery, B 1996, Relating: Dialogues and dialectics, The Guilford Press, New York.
Baxter, L, Scharp, K & Thomas, L 2021, ‘Relational dialectics theory’, Journal of Family Theory & Review, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 7–20.
Braun, V & Clarke, V 2006, ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101.
Chen, S, Boucher, HC & Molly, PT 2006, ‘The relational self revealed: Integrative conceptualization and implications for interpersonal life’, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 132, no. 2, pp. 151–179.
Donahue, EM, Robins, RW, Roberts, BW & John, OP 1993, ‘The divided self: Concurrent and longitudinal effects of psychological adjustment and social roles on self-concept differentiation’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 834–846.
Driessens, O 2013a, ‘The celebritization of society and culture: Understanding the structural dynamics of celebrity culture’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 641–657.
Driessens, O 2013b, ‘Celebrity capital: Redefining celebrity using field theory’, Theory and Society, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 543–560.
Finnish National Board on Research Integrity (TENK) 2019, ‘The ethical principles of research with human participants and ethical review in the human sciences in Finland’, retrieved 30 May 2026, https://tenk.fi/sites/default/files/2021-01/Ethical_review_in_human_sciences_2020.pdf.
Franssen, G 2022, ‘Gendering mental distress in celebrity culture: Introduction’, Celebrity Studies, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 467–469.
Galletta, A & Cross, WE 2013, Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond: From research design to analysis and publication, New York University Press, New York.
Gamson, J 1994, Claims to fame: Celebrity in contemporary America, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Gergen, KJ 1991, The saturated self: Dilemmas of identity in contemporary life, Basic Books, New York.
Gergen, KJ 1999, An invitation to social construction, SAGE Publications, London.
Goffman, E 1959, The presentation of self in everyday life, Anchor Books, New York.
Horton, D & Wohl, RR 1956, ‘Mass communication and parasocial interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance.’, Psychiatry, no. 19, pp. 215–229.
James, W 1890, The principles of psychology, Macmillan, London.
Jerslev, A & Mortensen, M 2016, ‘What is the self in the celebrity selfie? Celebrification, phatic communication and performativity’, Celebrity Studies, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 249–263.
Katriel, T & Philipsen, G 1981, ‘“What we need is communication”: “Communication” as a cultural category in some American speech’, Communication Monographs, vol. 48, no. 4, p. 301.
Kelly, SE 2010, ‘Qualitative interviewing techniques and styles’, in I Bourgeault, R Dingwall & R de Vries (eds), The SAGE handbook of qualitative methods in health research, SAGE Publications, London, pp. 307–326.
Klostermann, J, Meißner, M, Max, A & Decker, R 2023, ‘Presentation of celebrities’ private life through visual social media’, Journal of Business Research, vol. 156, p. 113524.
Maheshwari, S 2019, ‘Identity and self as reflected in fame and its processes’, Psychological Studies, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 306–315.
Marshall, PD 2010, ‘The promotion and presentation of the self: Celebrity as marker of presentational media’, Celebrity Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 35–48.
Marshall, PD 2020, ‘Celebrity, politics, and new media: An essay on the implications of pandemic fame and persona’, International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 89–104.
Marshall, PD, Moore, C & Barbour, K 2020, Persona studies: An introduction, Wiley Blackwell, Hoboken.
Marwick, A & Boyd, D 2011, ‘To see and be seen: Celebrity practice on Twitter’, Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, vol. 17.
Mead, GH 1934, Mind self and society, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Modell, AH 1993, The private self, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Oyserman, D, Elmore, K & Smith, G 2012, ‘Self, self-concept, and identity’, in MR Leary & JP Tangney (eds), Handbook of self and identity, Guilford Press, pp. 69–104.
Pauló, E 2025, ‘Older TikTokers in digital capitalism: Construction of persona and agency’, Persona Studies, vol. 11.
Petronio, S 2002, Boundaries of privacy: Dialectics of disclosure, State University of New York Press, Albany.
Raval, V 2013, ‘Fight or flight? Competing discourses of individualism and collectivism in runaway boys’ interpersonal relationships in India’, Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 410–429.
Rockwell, D & Giles, DC 2009, ‘Being a celebrity: A phenomenology of fame’, Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 178–210.
Rojek, C 2001, Celebrity, Reaktion Books, London.
Rotola-Pukkila, M & Isotalus, P 2021, ‘Ystävyyttä vai illuusiota?: Parasosiaalisen suhteen näkyminen seuraajien viesteissä sosiaalisen median vaikuttajalle’ [Friendship or illusion? The appearance of parasocial relationships in followers’ messages to the social media influencer], Lähikuva, vol. 34, no. 2–3, pp. 95–110.
Saari, O 2025, Missio vai mielenrauha, Werner Söderström Osakeyhtiö, Helsinki.
Scharp, KM & Thomas, LJ 2021, ‘Relational dialectics theory: A dialogic theory of meaning-making’, in P Schrodt, KM Scharp, & DO Braithwaite (eds), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication, Routledge, New York.
Sedikides, C, Hong, EK & Wildschut, T 2023, ‘Self-continuity’, Annual Review of Psychology, no. 74, pp. 333–361.
Sedikides, C, Wildschut, T, Cheung, W-Y, Routledge, C, Hepper, EG, Arndt, J, Vail, K, Zhou, X, Brackstone, K & Vingerhoets, AJJM 2016, ‘Nostalgia fosters self-continuity: Uncovering the mechanism (social connectedness) and consequence (eudaimonic well-being).’, Emotion, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 524–539.
Sokol, Y & Eisenheim, E 2016, ‘The relationship between continuous identity disturbances, negative mood, and suicidal ideation’, The Primary Care Companion for CNS Disorders, vol. 18, no. 1.
Stewart, S & Giles, D 2020, ‘Celebrity status and the attribution of value’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 3–17.
Strohminger, N, Knobe, J & Newman, G 2017, ‘The true self: A psychological concept distinct from the self’, Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 551–560.
Suter, EA, Parcell, ES, Adebayo, CT, Romo, DC & Weadock, CR 2024, ‘Charting a research agenda for relational dialectics theory: Forwarding critical theorizing in interpersonal and family communication research’, Journal of Family Communication, vol. 24, no. 3–4, pp. 177–195.
Swann, WB & Buhrmester, MD 2012, ‘Self-verification: The search for coherence’, in MR Leary & JP Tangney (eds), Handbook of self and identity, Guilford Press, New York, pp. 405–424.
Taylor, C 1991, ‘The dialogical self’, in DR Hiley, J Bohman & R Shusterman (eds), The interpretive turn: Philosophy, science, culture, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp. 304–314.
Tedeschi, JT 1986, ‘Private and public experiences and the self’, in RF Baumeister (ed.), Public self and private self, Springer, New York, pp. 1–20.
Thomas, LJ 2017, ‘Contrapuntal analysis’, in J Matthes, CS Davis & RF Potter (eds), The international encyclopedia of communication research methods, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 1–3.
van Tilburg, WAP, Sedikides, C, Wildschut, T & Vingerhoets, AJJM 2019, ‘How nostalgia infuses life with meaning: From social connectedness to self-continuity’, European Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 521–532.
Tyler, TR & Abetz, J 2019, ‘Interpersonal discourses between parent and LGBTQ child’, Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 267–289.
Wilkins, R & Isotalus, P 2009, ‘Speech culture in Finland’, in R Wilkins & P Isotalus (eds), Speech culture in Finland, University Press of America, Lanham, pp. 1–16.
Zhang, X & Stephen, TD 2025, ‘The self in communication research: A historical review, 1951–2020’, Annals of the International Communication Association, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 304–322.
Zou, X, Wildschut, T, Cable, D & Sedikides, C 2018, ‘Nostalgia for host culture facilitates repatriation success: The role of self-continuity’, Self and Identity, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 327–342.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Katariina Kakko, P. David Marshall, Pekka Isotalus

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
