Rethinking aid system narratives: The case for collaborative leadership
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21153/thl2023art1959Keywords:
disasters, humanitarian, disaster risk reduction, developmentAbstract
Disasters—whether so called ‘natural’ disasters or conflict related crises—are a growing challenge. Their impacts have a profound impact on development outcomes since disasters at best mitigate against development gains, and more commonly lead to development losses, particularly for people living in poverty. Yet while disasters are often treated as exceptional events, they in fact highlight failures in our development pathways—and expose the humanitarian and development system as unfit to respond adequately to these challenges. This paper reflects on the ways of thinking and incentives that shape the behaviour that leads to the perpetuation of this siloed and reactionary system and argues that there is a need to re-frame disasters as contextual factors rather than exceptional events within the development framework. Additionally, there is a need to support leaders who collaborate, instead of working to achieve individual success for their department or institution, and to strengthen accountability to make the development and humanitarian system more effective in supporting disaster affected and at-risk communities.
Metrics
Downloads
References
ANU School of Cybernetics. (2022). Re/defining Leadership in the 21st century: the view from cybernetics. ANU School of Cybernetics
Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davies, I. & Wisner, B. (1994). At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability, and Disasters.
Centre for Global Disaster Protection and Lloyds of London. (2018). Innovative finance for resilient infrastructure: Preliminary findings. London. Centre for Global Disaster Protection and Lloyds of London
Developmental Leadership Program. (2018). Inside the black box of political will: 10 years of findings from the Developmental Leadership Program. University of Birmingham, University College London, La Trobe University and the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT).
Global Network for Disaster Reduction. (2019). Views from the Frontline. Global Network for Disaster Reduction
Global Network for Disaster Reduction. (2022). Making Displacement Safer. Global Network for Disaster Reduction.
Hallegatte, S., Rentschler. J., and Rozenberg, J. (2019). Lifelines: The resilient infrastructure opportunity. Sustainable infrastructure series. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1430-3.
Malakar, Y. (2012). Increasing adaptive capacity: What is the role of local institutions? Risk Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy 3(4)
Natsios, A. (2010) The clash of the counter-bureaucracy and development. The Center for Global Development www.cgdev.org/content/publications/detail/142427
Peoples Vaccine Alliance. (9 Dec, 2020). Campaigners warn that 9 out of 10 people in poor countries are set to miss out on COVID-19 vaccine next year. https://www.oxfam.org/en/press-releases/campaigners-warn-9-out-10-people-poor-countries-are-set-miss-out-covid-19-vaccine.)
Scott Z. and Tarazona M. (2011). Study on disaster risk reduction, decentralization and political economy. The global assessment report on disaster risk reduction. UNDP Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery
Timmins, N. (2024). Failing those most at risk. Oxfam
Van Pragg, N. and Sattler, M. (2022) Accountability is about leadership, not mechanisms. Why we need to stop ‘doing’ AAP. Ground Truth Solutions.
Pangaro, P. (2002). Notes on the Role of Leadership and Language in Regenerating Organizations. https://pangaro.com/littlegreybook.pdf .
