Authenticity ahead of interdisciplinarity – a scoping review of student experiences in interdisciplinary science projects

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21153/jtlge2022vol13no1art1487

Keywords:

Employability, project-based learning, interdisciplinary competence, curriculum design

Abstract

Interdisciplinary projects are reported to facilitate the development of both disciplinary and generic skills. They vary in their design and implementation, but the effectiveness of different project models has not been studied. The aim of this study was to determine student satisfaction, engagement with learning and development of employability skills across interdisciplinary projects with different delivery models.

This scoping review appraises interdisciplinary projects implemented in science-based undergraduate degree programs. Projects with varying models of delivery, interdisciplinarity, authenticity and external partner involvement were examined, and the reported student learning and satisfaction ratings compared. Descriptive statistics and cross tabulation using Fisher’s Exact test were used to analyse the data.

The interdisciplinary project model had little effect on engagement with learning, but student satisfaction improved if the project task was rated as authentic (p<0.05). Improved learning was reported in about half of the projects reviewed. Improved employability was reported in projects where students used discipline-based skills to provide a consultancy (p<0.05), and those where an external partner was involved (p<0.05).

The interdisciplinary project model did not affect disciplinary or employability skill development, apart from interdisciplinary competence, which was significantly improved in a truly interdisciplinary project (p<0.01). Interpersonal skill development was significantly improved where projects had integrated rather than sequential tasks (p<0.05).

Overall, interdisciplinary projects that were authentic and/or involved an external partner generated better student satisfaction and real-world experience. These results inform the future design of interdisciplinary project-based learning tasks and encourage involvement of external partners in project design and delivery.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

  • Dr Joanne Hart, University of Sydney

    Dr Joanne Hart is an experienced researcher with extensive teaching experience in biomedical science and research methods. Dr Hart is a Senior Fellow of the Higher Education Academy and is particularly interested in interdisciplinary and project-based learning as well as developing Faculty capacity for delivering student research projects. She has extensive curriculum development experience at the unit of study, Degree Program and University level.

     

  • Dr Elisa Bone, Melbourne Centre for the Study of Higher Education, The University of Melbourne, Australia

    Dr Elisa Bone has a research background in ecology and extensive teaching experience in the biological sciences. She has led and implemented Faculty-level curriculum reviews and advises academics across STEM disciplines in curriculum innovation and design projects. Dr Bone has research interests in interdisciplinary and authentic teaching and learning in the sciences, including the use of collaborative digital tools, and in the effects of disruption on academics’ approaches to teaching and learning.

     

References

Acar, O. A., & Tuncdogan, A. (2019). Using the inquiry-based learning approach to enhance student innovativeness: a conceptual model. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(7), 895-909. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1516636

Adair, D., & Jaeger, M. (2014). Managing the interdisciplinary approach to engineering design. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 42(2), 175-184. https://doi.org/10.7227/IJMEE.0014

Aditomo, A., Goodyear, P., Bliuc, A.-M., & Ellis, R. A. (2013). Inquiry-based learning in higher education: principal forms, educational objectives, and disciplinary variations. Studies in Higher Education, 38(9), 1239-1258. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.616584

Alvarez-Bell, R. M., Wirtz, D., & Bian, H. (2017). Identifying keys to success in innovative teaching: Student engagement and instructional practices as predictors of student learning in a course using a team-based learning approach. Teaching and learning inquiry, 5(2), 128-146. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.5.2.10

Amador, J., & Miles, L. (2016). Live From Boone Lake: Interdisciplinary Problem-Based Learning Meets Public Science Writing. Journal of College Science Teaching, 45(6), 36-42. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst16_045_06_36

Anderson, N., Zhang, M., & McMaster, K. (2011). Integrating Health Information Systems into a Database Course: A Case Study. Information Systems Education Journal, 9(6), 38-43.

Australian Government. (2021). 2021 Graduate Outcomes Survey.

https://www.qilt.edu.au/surveys/graduate-outcomes-survey-(gos)#anchor-2

Bacon, C. M., Mulvaney, D., Ball, T. B., DuPuis, E. M., Gliessman, S. R., Lipschutz, R. D., & Shakouri, A. (2011). The Creation of an Integrated Sustainability Curriculum and Student Praxis Projects. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 12(2), 193-208. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14676371111118237

Beier, M. E., Kim, M. H., Saterbak, A., Leautaud, V., Bishnoi, S., & Gilberto, J. M. (2019). The effect of authentic project‐based learning on attitudes and career aspirations in STEM. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21465

Ben Youssef, B., & Berry, B. (2012). Learning to Think Spatially in an Undergraduate Interdisciplinary Computational Design Context: A Case Study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22(4), 541-564. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10798-010-9151-3

Bennie, B., Eager, E. A., Peirce, J. P., & Sandland, G. J. (2018). Using a Summer REU to Help Develop the Next Generation of Mathematical Ecologists. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 80(4), 926-944. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11538-018-0405-7

Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning. Educational psychologist, 26(3-4), 369-398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139

Bramhall, M. D., & Short, C. (2014, 06/01/). Education for Professional Engineering Practice. Industry and Higher Education, 28(3), 193-199.

Cheng, W., Wu, X., Zhang, Z., Liu, F., Zhang, M., & Guo, P. (2013). Effective project-oriented approach for training professional mechanical engineers in undergraduate education. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 41(4), 289-296. https://doi.org/10.7227/IJMEE.41.4.3

Clark, S., Byker, C., Niewotny, K., & Helms, J. (2013). Framing an Undergraduate Minor through the Civic Agriculture and Food Systems Curriculum. NACTA Journal, 57(2), 56-67. https://www.nactateachers.org/attachments/article/2070/11%20Clark%20June13.pdf

Clemes, M. D., Gan, C. E. C., & Kao, T.-H. (2008). University Student Satisfaction: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 17(2), 292-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841240801912831

Cline, K., Fasteen, J., Francis, A., Sullivan, E., & Wendt, T. (2020). A Vision for Projects across the Mathematics Curriculum. PRIMUS, 30(4), 379-399. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2019.1600176

Corno, F., & De Russis, L. (2017). Training Engineers for the Ambient Intelligence Challenge. IEEE Transactions on Education, 60(1), 40-49. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2016.2608785

Cross, I. D., & Congreve, A. (2021). Teaching (super) wicked problems: authentic learning about climate change. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 45(4), 491-516. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2020.1849066

Dexter, C. A. (2021). Service learning in an undergraduate adulthood and aging course: using life stories to connect students, content, and community. Educational Gerontology, 47(4), 172-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2021.1894531

Diamond, S., Middleton, A., & Mather, R. (2011). A cross-faculty simulation model for authentic learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48(1), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2010.518423

Dunbar, D., Terlecki, M., Watterson, N., & Ratmansky, L. (2013). An Honors Interdisciplinary Community-Based Research Course. Honors in Practice, 9, 129-140. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1080705.pdf

Duncan, S. I., Bishop, P., & Lenhart, S. (2010). Preparing the "New" Biologist of the Future: Student Research at the Interface of Mathematics and Biology. CBE - Life Sciences Education, 9(3), 311-315. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-03-0025

Everingham, Y., Gyuris, E., & Sexton, J. (2013). Using student feedback to improve student attitudes and mathematical confidence in a first year interdisciplinary quantitative course: from the ashes of disaster. International journal of mathematical education in science and technology, 44(6), 877-892. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.810786

Godemann, J. (2008). Knowledge integration: a key challenge for transdisciplinary cooperation. Environmental Education Research, 14(6), 625-641. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620802469188

Gruenther, K., Bailey, R., Wilson, J., Plucker, C., & Hashmi, H. (2009). The influence of prior industry experience and multidisciplinary teamwork on student design learning in a capstone design course. Design Studies, 30(6), 721-736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2009.06.001

Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101586. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586

Hart, J. (2019). Interdisciplinary Project-Based Learning as a Means of Developing Employability Skills in Undergraduate Science Degree Programs. Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability, 10(2), 50-66. https://doi.org/10.21153/jtlge2019vol10no2art827

Hayes, M., & Cejnar, L. (2020). Evaluating Alternative Work-Integrated Learning Opportunities: Student Perceptions of Interdisciplinary Industry-Based Projects. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.17.4.7

Heikkinen, J., & Isomottonen, V. (2015). Learning Mechanisms in Multidisciplinary Teamwork with Real Customers and Open-Ended Problems. European Journal of Engineering Education, 40(6), 653-670. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2014.1001818

Helle, L., Tynjälä, P., & Olkinuora, E. (2006). Project-based learning in post-secondary education: Theory, practice and rubber sling shots. Higher education, 51(2), 287-314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6386-5

Hun Bok, J., Zamora, F., & Duzgoren-Aydin, N. S. (2017). Water Quality Monitoring of an Urban Estuary and a Coastal Aquifer Using Field Kits and Meters: A Community-Based Environmental Research Project. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(10), 1512-1516. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00334

Jantsch, E. (1970). Inter- and Transdisciplinary University: A systems approach to education and innovation. Policy sciences, 1(1), 403-428. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00145222

Kłeczek, R., Hajdas, M., & Wrona, S. (2020). Wicked problems and project-based learning: Value-in-use approach. The International Journal of Management Education, 18(1), 100324. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2019.100324

Kricsfalusy, V., George, C., & Reed, M. G. (2018). Integrating problem- and project-based learning opportunities: assessing outcomes of a field course in environment and sustainability. Environmental Education Research, 24(4), 593-610. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1269874

Long, A. F., & Godfrey, M. (2004). An evaluation tool to assess the quality of qualitative research studies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 7(2), 181-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000045302

Marcketti, S. B., & Karpova, E. (2014). Getting Ready for the Real World: Student Perspectives on Bringing Industry Collaboration into the Classroom. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 106(1), 27-31.

Mason, S. G. (2008). Client-oriented Projects: GIS Course Design with the Potential to Serve Multiple Constituents. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 14(2), 241-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2008.12001522

McGunagle, D., & Zizka, L. (2020). Employability skills for 21st-century STEM students: the employers' perspective. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 10(3), 591-606. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-10-2019-0148

NHMRC. (2018). National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2007) - updated 2018. https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/publications/national-statement-ethical-conduct-human-research-2007-updated-2018

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., Stewart, L. A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A. C., Welch, V. A., Whiting, P., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Palmer, S., Campbell, M., Johnson, E., & West, J. (2018). Occupational Outcomes for Bachelor of Science Graduates in Australia and Implications for Undergraduate Science Curricula. Research in Science Education, 48(5), 989-1006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9595-x

Pellegrini, J. J., & Jansen, E. (2013) The Mayo Innovation Scholars Program: Undergraduates Explore the Science and Economics of Medical Innovations. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(4), 28-32. https://www.mnprivatecolleges.org/sites/default/files/2020-10/misp-journalcollegescienceteaching-2013.pdf

Quality Indicators for Learning and Teaching. (2021). 2021 Graduate Outcomes Survey – Longitudinal. https://www.qilt.edu.au/surveys/graduate-outcomes-survey---longitudinal-(gos-l)

Rees Lewis, D. G., Gerber, E. M., Carlson, S. E., & Easterday, M. W. (2019). Opportunities for educational innovations in authentic project-based learning: understanding instructor perceived challenges to design for adoption. Educational technology research and development, 67(4), 953-982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09673-4

Sanft, R., & Ziegler-Graham, K. (2018). Mathematics Practicum at St. Olaf College: Project-Based Learning through Academic Civic Engagement. PRIMUS, 28(4), 335-349. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2016.1249319

Sangster, S. L., Loy, K. L., Mills, S. D., & Lawson, K. L. (2016). Engaging First-year University Students in Research: Promise, Potentials, and Pitfalls. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2016.1.3

Shaffer, D., & Resnick, M. (1999). “Thick” authenticity: New media and authentic learning. Journal of interactive learning research, 10(2), 195-215. https://web.media.mit.edu/~mres/papers/authenticity/authenticity.pdf

Shanahan, D. E., Palmer, L. H., & Salas, J. (2019). Achieving Scaled and Sustained Use of Client-Based Projects in Business School Marketing Education: A Proposed Suprastructure. Journal of Marketing Education, 43(1), 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475319881179

Spronken‐Smith, R., & Walker, R. (2010). Can inquiry‐based learning strengthen the links between teaching and disciplinary research? Studies in Higher Education, 35(6), 723-740. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903315502

Talafian H, G. T., Hammrich PL, Lamberson L. (2019). Experiential Learning in a Summer Program: Engaging Undergraduate Students in STEM Research Experience. Summer Academe: A journal of Higher Education.

Vicente, A. J., Tan, T. A., & Yu, A. R. (2018). Collaborative Approach in Software Engineering Education: An Interdisciplinary Case. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 17, 127-152. https://doi.org/10.28945/4062

Villarroel, V., Bloxham, S., Bruna, D., Bruna, C., & Herrera-Seda, C. (2018). Authentic assessment: creating a blueprint for course design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 840-854. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1412396

Warr, M., & West, R. E. (2020). Bridging Academic Disciplines with Interdisciplinary Project-Based Learning: Challenges and Opportunities. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 14(1). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.14434/ijpbl.v14i1.28590

Warr Pedersen, K., Pharo, E., Peterson, C., & Clark, G. A. (2017). Wheels of change in higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 18(2), 171-184. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-10-2015-0172

Zafra-Gómez, J. L., Román-Martínez, I., & Gómez-Miranda, M. E. (2015). Measuring the impact of inquiry-based learning on outcomes and student satisfaction. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(8), 1050-1069. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.963836

Zanko, M., Papadopoulos, T., Taylor, T., Fallshaw, E., & Lawson, R. (2011). Professional learning in the business curriculum: engaging industry, academics and students. Asian Social Science, 7(4), 61-68. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v7n4p61

Downloads

Published

2022-11-13

Issue

Section

JOURNAL PAPERS

How to Cite

Authenticity ahead of interdisciplinarity – a scoping review of student experiences in interdisciplinary science projects. (2022). Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability, 13(1), 109-126. https://doi.org/10.21153/jtlge2022vol13no1art1487