Revolutionary Development: Why Humanitarian and Development Aid Need Radical Shifts
A new vision for international development has been called for, and evidence indicates that the industry is experiencing broad fragmentation in terms of identified priorities, challenges, concerns and paths forward. It has most notably struggled to share power with local and national counterparts and truly embody the principles of participatory development. Meanwhile, the rate and intensity of existential crises threaten to overtake humanity’s ability to adapt.
To replace deeply entrenched, unhelpful patterns (assumptions, behaviours and values) requires a new kind of thinking inspired and informed by transcendent learning processes that simultaneously lead to individual and collaborative action and transformation. This paper provides an argument which stresses the need for a seismic shift, from the still dominant underpinnings of modernism mindsets and patriarchal thought-forms towards a relational or participative consciousness that reflects feminist values and the deeply interconnected world that we live within.
Alden, C, Large, D and Mendez, A (2020) ‘The Western way of development: a critical review’, in Jing, Y, Mendez, A, Zheng, Y (eds), New development assistance: emerging economies and the new landscape of development assistance, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Bahre, S (15 March 2021) ‘How the aid sector marginalises women refugees’, The New Humanitarian, accessed 18 March 2021.
Becker, M (1999) ‘Patriarchy and inequality: towards a substantive feminism’, University of Chicago Legal Forum, vol 1999, article 3, https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1999/iss1/3
Bennet, C and Foley, M (April 2016) ‘Time to let go’, Overseas Development Institute HPG working paper, accessed 15 January 2021.
Brown, D, Donini, A and Knox Clarke, P (11–12 March 2014) ‘Engagement of crisis-affected people in humanitarian action’, ALNAP/ODI, accessed 1 March 2021.
Capra, F and Luisi, P (2014) The systems view of life: a unifying vision, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, doi:10.1017/CBO9780511895555
Chenoweth, E and Stephan, M (August 2011) Why civil resistance works: the strategic logic of nonviolent conflict, Columbia University Press, New York.
CIVICUS (2020) State of civil society report 2020, CIVICUS, Johannesburg, accessed 15 March 2021.
Cronin-Furman, K, Gowrinathan, N and Zakaria, R (2017) ‘Emissaries of empowerment’, Colin Powell School for Civic and Public Leadership, The City College of New York, accessed 15 January 2021.
Currion, P (2018) ‘Network humanitarianism’, Overseas Development Institute HPG working paper, accessed 15 January 2021.
Donini, A (2020) ‘Post-pandemic change? Humanitarian action and multilateralism in transnational times’, United Against Inhumanity, accessed 15 January 2021.
DuBois, M (May 2018) ‘The new humanitarian basics’, Overseas Development Institute HPG working paper, accessed 15 January 2021.
Eisler, R (1995) The chalice, the blade. Our history, our future , HarperCollins, New York.
Escobar, A (1995) The making and unmaking of the Third World, Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
Fast, L and Bennet, C (2020) ‘From the ground up: it’s about time for local humanitarian action’, Overseas Development Institute HPG working paper, accessed 15 January 2021.
Fletcher, G (June 2020) ‘When ‘leadership’ means acknowledging others might know better’, The Humanitarian Leader, working paper 007, Centre for Humanitarian Leadership, Melbourne.
Flummerfelt, R and Peyton, N (29 September 2020) ‘Power, poverty, and aid: the mix that fuelled sex abuse claims in Congo’, The New Humanitarian, accessed 15 January 2021.
Girvan, N (2008) Power imbalances and development knowledge, North-South Institute, Ottawa.
Glasius, M and Ishkanian, A (2015) ‘Surreptitious symbiosis: engagement between activists and NGOs’, International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, International Society for Third-Sector Research and The Johns Hopkins University, 26:2620–2644, doi: 10.1007/s11266-014-9531-5
Glennie, J (2020) The future of aid: global public investment, 1st edition, Routledge, London, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429356384
Harding, S (1982) ‘Is gender a variable in conceptions of rationality? A survey of issues’, Dialectica, 36(2/3), pp 225–42.
Harper, M and Albrectsen, A (2 March 2020) ‘Opinion: Why feminist leadership is essential to achieve gender equality’, Devex, accessed 15 January 2021.
Heron, J and Reason, P (1997) ‘A participatory inquiry paradigm’, Qualitative Inquiry, vol 3(3), pp 274, 294, https://doi. org/10.1177/107780049700300302
Ingram, G and Lord, K (26 March 2019) ‘Global development disrupted: findings from a survey of 93 leaders’, Global economy and development at Brookings Institution, accessed 15 January 2021.
Ismail, F and Kamat, S (2018) ‘NGOs, social movements and the neoliberal state: incorporation, reinvention, critique’, Critical Sociology, 44(4–5), pp 569–577, https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920517749804
James, E (2016) ‘The professional humanitarian and the downsides of professionalisation’, Disasters, 40(2), pp 185−206, doi: 10.1111/disa.12140
Kaplan, A, Davidoff, S and Proteus, I (2014) A delicate activism: a radical approach to change, Proteus Initiative, Constantia.
Karriem, A and Benjamin, L (January 2016) ‘How civil society organizations foster insurgent citizenship: lessons from the Brazilian landless movement’, International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, International Society for Third-Sector Research and The Johns Hopkins University, 27, pp 19–36, doi: 10.1007/s11266-015-9549-3
Koçoğlu, I, Akgün, AE and Keskin, H (2016) ‘The collective unconscious at the organizational level: the manifestation of organizational symbols’, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, pp 296–303.
Konyndyk, J (2019) ‘Five takeaways on the future of humanitarian reform’, Centre for Global Development, accessed 15 January 2021.
Kothari, U (2005) ‘Authority and expertise: the professionalisation of international development and the ordering of dissent’, Antipode, 2995, 37(3), pp 425–46, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00505.x
Kramer, R (1981) Voluntary agencies in the welfare state, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Ladha, A and Kirk, M (2016) ‘Seeing wetiko: on capitalism, mind viruses, and antidotes for a world in transition’, Kosmos Journal, accessed 15 January 2021.
Liinason, M (she/her/hers) (2021) ‘“Drawing the line” and other small-scale resistances: exploring agency and ambiguity in transnational feminist and queer NGOs’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 23:1, pp 102–24, doi: 10.1080/14616742.2020.1775489
McLuhan, M (1964) Understanding media: the extensions of man, 7th edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.
McQuade, J (27 September 2017) ‘Colonialism was a disaster and the facts prove it’, The Conversation, accessed 15 January 2021.
Meadows, DH (2008) Thinking in systems: a primer, Earthscan, London; Sterling, Virginia.
Norgaard, R (1994) Development betrayed: the end of progress and a co-evolutionary revisioning of the future, Routledge, London.
OECD (25 June 2019) What do people tell us about the humanitarian aid they receive?, OECD Publishing, https://doi. org/10.1787/9d39623d-en
OECD (2020) Development assistance committee members and civil society, The Development Dimension, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/51eb6df1-en
O’Hearn, D (2009) ‘Amartya Sen’s development as freedom: ten years later’, Policy and Practice: A Aevelopment Education Review, vol 8, spring, pp 9–15.
Okech, A (2017) ‘On feminist futures and movement imperatives’, Development, 60, pp 12–17, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-017-0125-6
O’Neill, T, Domingo, P and Valters, C (2014) ‘Progress on women’s empowerment: from technical fixes to political action’,
Overseas Development Institute, Development Progress working paper, accessed 15 February 2021.
Society for Participatory Research in Asia (PRIA) (2012) ‘Civil society @ crossroads: shifts, challenges, options?’, Civil Society at Crossroads Initiative, accessed 15 January 2021.
Rand, D, Greene, J and Nowak, M (2012) ‘Spontaneous giving and calculated greed’, Nature, vol 489, 427–430, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11467
Ramalingam, B, Jones, H, Reba, T and Young, J (2008) ‘Exploring the science of complexity: ideas and implications for development and humanitarian efforts’, Overseas Development Institute, working paper 285, accessed 15 January 2021.
Read, J (2009) ‘A genealogy of homo-economicus: neoliberalism and the production of subjectivity’, Foucault Studies, no 6, pp 25–36.
Rodriguez Enriquez, C (March–April 2015) ‘Feminist economics and economics of care. Conceptual contributions to the study of inequality’, Nueva Sociedad, accessed 18 March 2021.
Rowe, JK and Lipschutz, R (2005) Globalization, governmentality and global politics: regulation for the rest of us?, 1st edition, Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203799260
Rush, H, Marshall, N, Bessant, J and Ramalingam, B (2021) ‘Applying an ecosystems approach to humanitarian innovation’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol 165, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120529
Sen, A (1999) Development as freedom, Alfred Knopf, New York.
Scott, J (1998) ‘Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed’ in Wallace, T 2020, ‘Re-imagining development by (re)claiming feminist visions of development alternatives’, Gender & Development, Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 28:1, pp 31–49, doi: 10.1080/13552074.2020.1724698
Slim, H (27 August 2020) ‘You don’t have to be neutral to be a good humanitarian’, The New Humanitarian, accessed 15 January 2021.
Sriskandarajah, D (2015) ‘Five reasons donors give for not funding local NGOs directly’, The Guardian, accessed 15 March 2021.
Steffen, W, Richardson, K, Rockström, J, Cornell, SE, Fetzer, I, Bennett, EM, Biggs, R, Carpenter, SR, de Vries, W, de Wit, CA, Folke, C, Gerten, D, Heinke, J, Mace, GM, Persson, LM, Ramanathan, V, Reyers B and Sörlin, S (2015) ‘Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet’, Science, 347(6223), doi: 10.1126/science.1259855
Steiner, R (1986) ‘Spiritual science as a foundation for social forms’ in Kaplan, A, Davidoff, S and Proteus I 2014, A delicate activism: a radical approach to change, Anthroposophic Press, Cape Town.
Stewart-Harawira, M (2007) ‘Practising indigenous feminism: resistance to imperialism’, in Joyce Green (ed), Making space for indigenous feminism, Fernwood Publishing, Novia Scotia.
Stibral, A (February 2021) ‘Studying humanitarianism: a course audit of master’s degree programs in humanitarian action’, The Humanitarian Leader, Centre for Humanitarian Leadership, Melbourne.
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) (27 April 2020) ‘Global military expenditure sees largest annual increase in a decade—says SIPRI—reaching $1917 billion in 2019’, accessed 15 January 2021.
Sveiby, KE (2009) ‘Aboriginal principles for sustainable development as told in traditional law stories’, Sustainable Development, 17(6), pp 20–21, https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.389
United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) (2015) ‘Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development’, A/RES/70/1.
Vancluysen, S and Ingleare, B (2020) ‘How refugees resolve disputes: insights from a Ugandan settlement’, The Conversation, accessed 15 January 2021.
Vermeulen, T and van den Akker, R (2010) ‘Notes on metamodernism’, Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, vol 2(0), doi:10.3402/jac.v2i0.5677
Wallace, T (2020) ‘Re-imagining development by (re)claiming feminist visions of development alternatives’, Gender & development, 28:1, pp 31–49, doi: 10.1080/13552074.2020.1724698
Walton, O, Davies, T, Thrandardottir, E and Keating, V (2016) ‘Understanding contemporary challenges to INGO legitimacy: integrating top-down and bottom-up perspectives’, Voluntas, 27, pp 2764–86, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9768-2
Willits-King, B, Assomull R, Bryant, J, McCartney C, Dhami T and Llewellyn, D with Adamczyk, S (October 2019) ‘New financing partnerships for humanitarian impact’, Overseas Development Institute HPG working paper, accessed 15 January 2021.
Yuval-Davis, N (2011) The politics of belonging: intersectional contestations, Sage, London.