When 'Leadership' Means Acknowledging Others Might Know Better

Auteurs

  • Gillian Fletcher CollectiveChange, Australia

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.21153/thl2020volno0art1020

Mots-clés :

Humanitarian leadership, inclusion

Résumé

Humanitarian work in the early twenty-first-century is steeped in the rhetoric of ‘inclusion’ and ‘leave no one behind’. Yet, “too often it is the most vulnerable people and the people most in need [who] fall through the cracks” of humanitarian responses (International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies 2018, p. 5).

This paper argues that humanitarian leadership is in need of a major paradigm shift: one requiring agencies to actually learn from people’s lived reality, rather than trying to fit that lived reality into pre-existing international systems and procedures. Humanitarians should reconsider tools that are not fit for purpose and reconsider ways of working that are built on a flawed logic of ‘vulnerability’ and ‘protection’. This paradigm shift is vital for ensuring that those “most vulnerable people”, the most marginalised and excluded, are at the forefront of humanitarian (and development) thinking.

(International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) 2018, ‘Leaving no one behind’, World Disasters Report, IFRC, Geneva, https://media.ifrc.org/ifrc/world-disaster-report-2018/)

Métriques

Chargements des métriques ...

Téléchargements

Les données de téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponible.

Biographie de l'auteur

  • Gillian Fletcher, CollectiveChange, Australia

    Founding partner, CollectiveChange, Melbourne, Australia.

Références

Acker, J 2006, ‘Inequality regimes: gender, class, and race in organizations’, Gender & Society, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 441–464.

Agenda for Humanity 2017, World Humanitarian Summit 2016, viewed 4 December 2019, https://www.agendaforhumanity.org/summit?_redirect_whsres

Ban, K-M 2016, One humanity: shared responsibility, Report of the United Nations Secretary-General for the World Humanitarian Summit, United Nations, New York

Charter4Change 2015, ‘Charter for Change’, viewed 12 September 2019, https://charter4change.org/2015/07/31/thecharter/

Clarke, M & Parris, BW 2019, Vale the humanitarian principles: new principles for a new environment, Centre for Humanitarian Leadership & Deakin University, Melbourne, https://centreforhumanitarianleadership.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Paper-001-•-Vale-the-Humanitarian-Principles.pdf

Collins, PH 1993, ‘Toward a new vision: race, class, and gender as categories of analysis and connection’, Race, Sex & Class, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 25–45

Connell, RW 2002, Gender, Polity Press, Cambridge

Connell, RW 2005 [1995], Masculinities, 2nd edn, University of California Press, Berkeley

Cornwall, A 2003, ‘Whose voices? Whose choices? Reflections on gender and participatory development’, World Development, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1325–1342

Cornwall, A & Eade, D (eds.) 2010, Deconstructing development discourse: buzzwords and fuzzwords, Practical Action Publishing, Rugby & Oxfam GB, Oxford

Eade, D 2010, ‘Preface’, Deconstructing development discourse: buzzwords and fuzzwords, Cornwall, A & Eade, D (eds.), Practical Action Publishing, Rugby & Oxfam GB, Oxford

Fletcher, G 2014, ‘Just how do we create change? Sites of contradiction and the “black box” of change in primary prevention’, Preventing sexual violence: interdisciplinary approaches to overcoming a rape culture, Henry, N & Powell, A (eds), Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke & New York, pp. 127–149

Fletcher, G 2015a, Addressing gender in impact evaluation: what should be considered?, Overseas Development Institute, London, https://www.odi.org/publications/9933-addressing-gender-impact-evaluation-what-should-beconsidered

Fletcher, G 2015b, Gender, sexuality and inequality, Developmental Leadership Program, Birmingham & London, https://www.dlprog.org/publications/research-papers/gender-sexuality-and-inequality

Fletcher, G 2019, Engendering transformative change in international development, Hurd, H (ed), Routledge Explorations in Development Studies, Routledge, London & New York

Funnell, SC & Rogers PJ 2011, Purposeful program theory: effective use of theories of change and logic models, JosseyBass, San Francisco

Global Humanitarian Platform 2007, Principles of partnership: a statement of commitment, Geneva

Global Public Policy Institute & Inspire Consortium, no date, Methodology to assess coordinated multi-sector needs assessments, Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC), Geneva, https://interagencystandingcommittee.org/system/files/ws5_-_quality_criteria_and_eval_methodology_for_msnas_and_hnos_0.pdf

Glouberman, S & Zimmerman B 2002, Complicated and complex systems: what would successful reform of medicare look like?, Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada, Ottawa

Grand Bargain Workstream 5, no date, Grand bargain principles for coordinated needs assessment ethos, IASC, Geneva, https://interagencystandingcommittee.org/system/files/ws5_-_collaborative_needs_assessment_ethos.pdf

High-Level Panel on Humanitarian Financing 2017, Too important to fail: addressing the humanitarian financing gap, https://interagencystandingcommittee.org/grand-bargain-hosted-iasc/documents/high-level-panel-humanitarianfinancing-report-secretary-general

International Council of Voluntary Agencies (ICVA), no date, Global humanitarian platform: an pverview, viewed 12 September 2019, https://www.icvanetwork.org/global-humanitarian-platform-ghp-overview

International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) 2018, ‘Leaving no one behind’, World Disasters Report, IFRC, Geneva, https://media.ifrc.org/ifrc/world-disaster-report-2018/

Kimmel, MS & Ferber, AL (eds.) 2014, Privilege: a reader, Westview Press, Boulder

Leal, PA 2010, ‘Participation: the ascendancy of a buzzword in the neo-liberal era’, Deconstructing development discourse: buzzwords and fuzzwords, Cornwall A & Eade, D (eds), Practical Action Publishing, Rugby & Oxfam GB, Oxford, pp. 89–100

Lyne de Vere, H 2009, Conceptions of leadership, Developmental Leadership Program, London & Birmingham

Marshall, GC 1947, ‘The Marshall Plan Speech’, viewed 22 August 2019, https://www.marshallfoundation.org/marshall/the-marshall-plan/marshall-plan-speech/

Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs 2018, United Nations disaster assessment and coordination field handbook, United Nations, New York

Ore, TE 2009, The social construction of difference and inequality: race, class, gender, and sexuality, McGraw Hill, New York

Rahman, M & Jackson, S 2010, Gender & sexuality: sociological approaches, Polity Press, Cambridge & Malden

Reid, E, Waring, M, Rodriguez Enriquez, C & Shivdas, M 2012, ‘Embracing disruptions, responding to uncertainties, valuing agency: situating a feminist approach to social protection’, Development , vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 291–298

Steering Committee for Humanitarian Response 2010, Global humanitarian platform background paper: changing environment, growing complexities, increasing demands – implications for humanitarian actors, Geneva

Truman, HS 1949, ‘Inaugural address’, viewed 22 August 2019, https://www.trumanlibrary.gov/library/public-papers/19/inaugural-address

UNHCR Policy on Age, gender and diversity policy, United Nations, 2011

United Nations 1948, UN Charter, viewed 1 January 2020, http://www.un.org/aboutun/charter/

United Nations 2015, The millennium development goals report, United Nations, New York

United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) 2018, Staying the course: delivering on the ambition of the world humanitarian summit, OCHA, New York, https://www.unocha.org/sites/unocha/files/Staying%20the%20course_AFH%20synthesis%20report%202018_singles.pdf

World leaders sit in rows of seats

Téléchargements

Publiée

2020-02-11

Numéro

Rubrique

Articles

Comment citer

« When ’Leadership’ Means Acknowledging Others Might Know Better » (2020) Le Leader Humanitaire, p. Working Paper 007, June 2020. doi:10.21153/thl2020volno0art1020.