Considering the benefits of research participation: insights from a study of adult EAL educators
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21153/tesol2020vol29no2art1434Keywords:
research participation, teacher-researcher relationships, professional learning, EAL, adult education, digital literaciesAbstract
Despite the professional learning benefits that may be realised through participation in research, many institutions and teachers are reluctant to get involved. They (correctly) anticipate that it will require some time, effort, and commitment. They may understand that research is important for improving education practices but more direct and immediate value for them and, importantly, how to gain it may not be obvious. To address this issue, we report a part of a six-month study that used institutional ethnography as the method of inquiry. We present and analyse three generative episodes that we observed and experienced in the context of our research collaboration with the participants at one adult community-based English as an Additional Language (EAL) institution in Melbourne (Australia). These episodes provide important insights into the ways in which our participants were proactive in realising the benefits of participating in the research. The participating teachers brought research and practice into regular dialogue and strategically utilised our partnership for their professional learning. We conclude by discussing some practical strategies for EAL institutions, teachers, and researchers who want to unlock and maximise the learning potential of research partnerships.
Metrics
References
Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational researcher, 41(1), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11428813
Avgitidou, S. (2020). Facilitating teachers as action researchers and reflective practitioners: New issues and proposals. Educational Action Research, 28(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2019.1654900
Befort, C., Lynch, R., James, R. L., Carroll, S. L., Nollen, N., & Davis, A. (2008). Perceived barriers and benefits to research participation among school administrators. Journal of School Health, 78(11), 615-617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.00349.x
Broemmel, A., Evans, K., Lester, J., Rigell, A., & Lochmiller, C. (2019). Teacher reading as professional development: Insights from a national survey. Reading Horizons (Online), 58(1), 1-21. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/2206963207/
Clark, T. (2010). On ‘being researched’: why do people engage with qualitative research? Qualitative Research, 10(4), 399- 419. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110366796
Cowie, B., Otrel-Cass, K., Moreland, J., Jones, A., Bell, B., & Taylor, M. (2010). Teacher-researcher relationships and collaborations in research. Waikato Journal of Education, 15(2), 69-80. https://doi.org/10.15663/wje.v20i3.239
Eiserman, W. D., & Behl, D. (1992). Research participation: Benefits and considerations for the special educator. Teaching Exceptional Children, 24(3), 12-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005999202400304
Hafner, C. (2019). Digital literacies for English language learners. In X. Gao (Ed.), Second Handbook of English Language Teaching (pp.899-918). Springer International Handbooks of Education.
Heath, S., Charles, V., Crow, G., & Wiles, R. (2007). Informed consent, gatekeepers and go-betweens: negotiating consent in child and youth-orientated institutions. British Educational Research Journal, 33(3), 403-417. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701243651
Jones, R. H., & Hafner, C. A. (2012). Understanding digital literacies: A practical introduction. Routledge.
Jurasaite-Harbison, E., & Rex, L. A. (2005). Taking on a researcher’s identity: Teacher learning in and through research participation. Linguistics and Education, 16(4), 425-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2006.05.004
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner doing critical participatory action research. Springer Science & Business Media.
Kenny, E. (2016). Settlement in the digital age: Digital inclusion and newly arrived young people from refugee and migrant backgrounds. Retrieved from https://www.cmy.net.au/resource/settlement-in-the-digital-age/
Lau, S. M. C., & Stille, S. (2014). Participatory research with teachers: toward a pragmatic and dynamic view of equity and parity in research relationships. European Journal of Teacher Education, 37(2), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2014.882313
Matthews, J. (2008). Schooling and settlement: refugee education in Australia. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 18(1), 31-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620210802195947
Merriam, S., & Tisdell, E. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Mitchell, S. N., Reilly, R. C., & Logue, M. E. (2009). Benefits of collaborative action research for the beginning teacher. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(2), 344-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.06.008
Nussbaum, L. (2017). Doing research with teachers. In E. Moore & M. Dooly (Eds.), Qualitative approaches to research on plurilingual education (pp. 46-67). Research-publishing.net.
Oliver, R., Rochecouste, J., & Nguyen, B. (2017). ESL in Australia – a chequered history. TESOL in Context, 26(1), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.21153/tesol2017vol26no1art700700
Prendergast, S., & Rickinson, M. (2019). Understanding school engagement in and with research. A Publication of the Australian Association for Research in Education, 46(1), 17-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0292-9
Reimer, K. M., & Bruce, B. (1994). Building teacher-researcher collaboration: Dilemmas and strategies. Educational Action Research, 2(2), 211-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965079940020206
Rex, L. A., Murnen, T. J., Hobbs, J., & McEachen, D. (2002). Teachers’ pedagogical stories and the shaping of classroom participation: “The Dancer” and “Graveyard Shift at the 7-11”. American Educational Research Journal, 39(3), 765-796. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312039003765
Richard, V., & Bélanger, M. (2018). Accepting research: teachers’ representations of participation in educational research projects. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 4(2), 61-73. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.4.2.61
Shariati, S., Armarego, J., & Sudweeks, F. (2017). The Impact of e-skills on the settlement of Iranian refugees in Australia. Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Lifelong Learning, 13, 60-76. https://doi.org/10.28945/3704
Smith, D. E. a. (2005). Institutional ethnography: A sociology for people. AltaMira Press.
Tickle, S. (2017). Ethnographic research with young people: Methods and rapport. Qualitative Research Journal, 17(2), 66-76. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-10-2016-0059
Troman, G. (1996). No Entry Signs: Educational change and some problems encountered in negotiating entry to educational settings. British Educational Research Journal, 22(1), 71-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192960220105
Wanat, C. L. (2008). Getting past the gatekeepers: Differences between access and cooperation in public school research. Field Methods, 20(2), 191-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X07313811
West, J. (2016). Access, sites and settings. In D. Wyse, N. Selwyn, E. Smith & L. Suter (Eds.), The BERA/SAGE handbook of educational research (pp. 547-570). SAGE.
Williams, A. (2018). The Ethics of TESOL a quarter century on. TESOL in Context, 27(2), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.21153/tesol2018vol27no2art828
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 TESOL in Context
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
