Features of Online Second Language Interactional Competence in a German-Israeli Virtual Exchange
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21153/tesol2022vol30no2art1568Keywords:
Second Language Interactional Competence, Interactional Competence, L2 IC, Conversation Analysis, Virtual Exchange, Telecollaboration, Online Intercultural Exchange, Israel, Germany, Micro-Analysis, GAT 2, Multimodal Resources, Epistemics, Multilingual Resources, Code-Switching, Turn-Taking, Online, Video Conferencing, TransanaAbstract
Virtual Exchange (VE) is a method of intercultural online learning in which groups of learners collaborate with partners from another culture or geographical area in joint projects. Lingua Franca VEs combine numerous advantages, such as the acquisition of digital and intercultural skills, and further create an environment in which the foreign language is used in an authentic and immersive setting. Although VE is a highly communicative method, Second Language Interactional Competence (L2 IC) has barely been subjected to scientific scrutiny in this context yet.
By investigating the first thirty minutes of ten initial student group meetings, this cross-sectional study explores the interactional resources that participants display during online talk-in-interaction. Multimodal Conversation Analysis is applied to the data consisting of GAT2 transcriptions of recorded ZOOM video conferences. These online meetings between EFL undergraduate students in secondary school teacher training are part of the VE project Extended Telecollaboration Practice (Waldman, Harel & Schwab, 2019) between Israel and Germany which was initiated in 2015 and is still on-going.
This paper depicts the online-specific strategies that EFL-students adopt in order to gain common ground. Further, it will argue that some L2 IC features, such as turn-taking and multilingual resources, come with particular dynamics and characteristics in a VE context.
Metrics
References
Andujar, A., Salaberri-Ramiro, M. S., & Martínez, M. S. C. (2020). Integrating flipped foreign language learning through mobile devices: Technology acceptance and flipped learning experience. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031110
Anton, D., Kurillo, G., & Bajcsy, R. (2018). User experience and interaction performance in 2D/3D telecollaboration. Future Generation Computer Systems, 82(January 2018), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.12.055
Auer, P. (2021). Turn-allocation and gaze: A multimodal revision of the “current-speaker-selects-next” rule of the turn-taking system of conversation analysis. Discourse Studies, 23(2), 117–140.
Balaman, U. & Sert, O. (2017). Development of L2 interactional resources for online collaborative task accomplishment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(7), 601–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1334667
Bali, M., Goes, P., Haug, E., & Patankar, A. (2021). COVID-19 impacts on virtual exchange around the world. Journal of Virtual Exchange, 4, 117-124.
Chanethom, V. (2020). Students’ Attitudes Toward Critical Telecollaboration: A Case Study in an L2/L3 French Classroom. In Technology-enhanced Learning and Linguistic Diversity: Strategies and Approaches to Teaching Students in a 2nd or 3rd Language. Emerald Publishing Limited.
Chun, D. M. (2011). Developing intercultural communicativecompetence through online exchanges. Calico Journal, 28(2), 392-419.
Clayman, S. (2013). “Turn-constructional units and the transition-relevance place,” in T. Stivers and J. Sidnell (Eds.). Handbook of Conversation Analysis(pp. 151–166). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Colpaert, J. (2020). Editorial position paper: How virtual is your research? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(7), 653–664. doi:10.1080/09588221.2020.1824059
Cunningham, D. J. (2017). Second language pragmatic appropriateness in telecollaboration: The influence of discourse management and grammaticality. System, 64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.12.006
Dooly, M. (2017). Telecollaboration. The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning, 169-183.
Dooly, M., & Sadler, R. (2016). Becoming little scientists: Technologically-enhanced project-based language learning. Language Learning and Technology, 20(1), 54–78.
Dooly, M., & Smith, B. (2020). Telecollaboration and virtual exchange between practice and research: a conversation. Journal of Virtual Exchange, 3(SI), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.21827/jve.3.36085
Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1997). On Discourse, Communication, and (Some) Fundamental Concepts in SLA Research. The Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 285. https://doi.org/10.2307/329302
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Ethnomethodology. Studies in ethnomethodology.
Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization. Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press
Greer, T. (2013). Word search sequences in bilingual interaction: Codeswitching and embodied orientation toward shifting participant constellations. Journal of Pragmatics, 57, 100-117.
Guth, S., & Helm, F. (2010). Telecollaboration 2.0 : language, literacies and intercultural learning in the 21st century. Peter Lang. https://www.worldcat.org/title/telecollaboration-20-language-literacies-and-intercultural-learning-in-the-21st-century/oclc/1105614928
Harris, J. (1999). First steps in telecollaboration. Learning & Leading With Technology, 27(3), 54-57.
Hauck, M., & Youngs, B. L. (2008). Telecollaboration in multimodal environments: The impact on task design and learner interaction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(2), 87–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220801943510
Heath, C., & Luff, P. (2012). Embodied action and organizational activity. The handbook of conversation analysis, 281-307.
Helm, F. (2018). Emerging identities in virtual exchange. Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2018.25.9782490057191
Helm, F., & Acconcia, G. (2019). Interculturality and language in Erasmus+ Virtual Exchange. European Journal of Language Policy 11(2), 211-233. https://www.muse.jhu.edu/article/737426.
Heritage, J. (2017). Conversation analysis and institutional talk: Analyzing distinctive turn-taking. Dialoganalyse VI/2, 3-18.
Hoffmann, S., & Schwab, G. (2017). Aushandeln von Rederechten im Unterricht Eine multimodale Vergleichsstudie zur fremdsprachlichen Unterrichtsinteraktion in Italien und Deutschland.
Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation analysis. Polity.
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. sociolinguistics, 269293, 269-293.
Jakonen, T., & Morton, T. (2015). Epistemic search sequences in peer interaction in a content-based language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 36(1), 73-94.
Jauregi, K., & Melchor-Couto, S. (2017). CALL in a climate of change: adapting to turbulent global conditions – short papers from EUROCALL 2017 (K. Borthwick, L. Bradley, & S. Thouësny (eds.); pp. 163–169). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2017.eurocall2017.9782490057047
Jenks, C. J. (2014). Social Interaction in Second Language Chat Rooms. Edinburgh University Press.
Kääntä, L. (2014). From noticing to initiating correction: Students’ epistemic displays in instructional interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 66, 86-105.
Kohn, K., & Hoffstaedter, P. (2015). Flipping intercultural communication practice: Opportunities and challenges for the foreign language classroom. ANTWERP CALL 2015: Task Design and CALL, April, 1–6.
Kramsch, C. (1986). From Language Proficiency to Interactional Competence. The Modern Language Journal, 70(4), 366–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05291.x
Kupetz, M. (2011). Multimodal resources in students' explanations in CLIL interaction. Novitas-Royal, 5(1).
Leyland, C. (2014). Conversation Analysis Across Borders. JALT 2014: Conversations Across Borders.
Li, W. (2002). “What do you want me to say?” On the conversation analysis approach to bilingual interaction. Language in Society, 31(2), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404501020140
Lipski, J. M. (2016). The role of unintentional/involuntary codeswitching: Did I really say that?.
Markaki, V., & Mondada, L. (2012). Embodied orientations towards co-participants in multinational meetings. Discourse Studies, 14(1), 31-52.
Markee, N. (2008). Toward a learning behavior tracking methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 404–427. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm052
Melander, H. (2012). Transformations of knowledge within a peer group. Knowing and learning in interaction. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(3-4), 232-248.
Mondada, L. (2004). Ways of ‘doing being plurilingual’in international work meetings. Second language conversations, 27-60.
Mondada, Lorenza (2007). Multimodal resources for turn-taking: Pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers. Discourse Studies 9, 195-226.
Mondada, L. (2015). Multimodal completions. Temporality in interaction, 27, 267.
O'Dowd, R. (2007). Evaluating the outcomes of online intercultural exchange. ELT journal, 61(2), 144-152.
O’Dowd, R. (2016). Learning from the Past and Looking to the Future of Online Intercultural Exchange. Online Intercultural Exchange: Policy, Pedagogy, Practice, 2014, 273–293.
O’Dowd, R. (2018). Exploring the Impact of Telecollaboration in Initial Teacher Education: The EVALUATE project. The EuroCALL Review, 25(2), 38. https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2017.7636
O’Dowd, R. (2021). Virtual exchange: moving forward into the next decade. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(3), 209-224.
Porto, M. (2014). Intercultural citizenship education in an EFL online project in Argentina. Language and Intercultural Communication 14.2, 245–261. doi: 10.1080/14708477.2014.890625
Rampazzo, L., & Aranha, S. (2019). Telecollaboration and genres: a new perspective to understand language learning. Journal of Virtual Exchange, 2, 7-28.
Rhee, T., Thompson, S., Medeiros, D., Dos Anjos, R., & Chalmers, A. (2020). Augmented Virtual Teleportation for High-Fidelity Telecollaboration. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 26(5), 1923–1933. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.2973065
Rubin, J. (2016). The collaborative online international learning network. In R. O’Dowd & T. Lewis (Eds.), Online intercultural exchange: policy, pedagogy, practice (pp. 263–272). London: Routledge.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1978). A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn Taking for Conversation**This chapter is a variant version of “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation,” which was printed in Language, 50, 4 (1974), pp. 696–735. An e. Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, 7–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-623550-0.50008-2
Schegloff, E. A. (1984). On some gesture's relation to talk. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 266-296). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schwab, G. (2006). Transana–ein Transkriptions-und Analyseprogramm zur Verarbeitung von Videodaten am Computer. Gesprächsforschung, 7, 70-78.
Schwab, G., & Drixler, N. (2020). Telekollaboration und Digitalisierung in der Hochschullehre. Interkulturelles Lernen durch virtuellen Austausch im Studium zukünftiger LehrerInnen. Hochschullehre digital gestalten in der (fremd-) sprachlichen LehrerInnenbildung: Inhalte, Methoden und Aufgaben, 231-250.
Seedhouse, P. (2005). Conversation Analysis and language learning. Language Teaching, 38(4), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444805003010
Selting, M., Auer, P., Barth-Weingarten, D., Bergmann, J., Bergmann, P., Birkner, K., Couper-Kuhlen, E., Deppermann, A., Gilles, P., Günthner,
S., Hartung, M., Kern, F., Mertzlufft, C., Meyer, C., Morek, M., Oberzaucher, F., Peters, J., Quasthoff, U., Schütte, W., … Uhmann, S. (2011). A system for transcribing talk-in-interaction: GAT 2. Translated and adapted for English by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Dagmar Barth-Weingarten. Gesprächsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift Zur Verbalen Interaktion, 12(12), 1–51. http://www.gespraechsforschung-ozs.de/heft2011/px-gat2-englisch.pdf
Sert, O. (2015). Social Interaction and L2 Classroom Discourse. Edinburgh University Press.
Sert, O., & Seedhouse, P. (2011). Introduction: Conversation analysis in applied linguistics. Novitas-Royal, 5(1).
Sert, O., & Walsh, S. (2013). The interactional management of claims of insufficient knowledge in English language classrooms. Language and Education, 27(6), 542-565.
Sevilla Pavón, A., & Haba Osca, J. (2017). Learning from real life and not books: A gamified approach to task design in transatlantic telecollaboration. Iberica, 2017, vol. 33, p. 235-260.
Shum, W. L. W. (2021). Designing Teaching Materials for Intercultural Interaction Learning: The Role of Conversation Analysis.
Sindoni, M. G. (2014). Spoken and written discourse in online interactions: A multimodal approach. Routledge.
Steensig, J. (2019). Conversation analysis and affiliation and alignment. The Concise Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, 248.
Stein, P. (2007). Multimodal pedagogies in diverse classrooms: Representation, rights and resources. Routledge.
Tay, M. W. (1989). Code switching and code mixing as a communicative strategy in multilingual discourse. World Englishes, 8(3), 407-417.
Tcherepashenets, N. (2016). Telecollaboration, world citizenship and the quest for the social justice: US–Mexico project. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Telecollaboration in Higher Education, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
Tecedor Cabrero, M. (2013). Developing interactional competence through video-based computer-mediated conversations: Beginning learners of Spanish. 75(1-A(E)).
Ten Have, P. (2007). Doing conversation analysis. Sage.
Torras, M. C. (2005). Social identity and language choice in bilingual service talk. In Applying conversation analysis (pp. 107-123). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of LS Vygotsky: The fundamentals of defectology (Vol. 2). Springer Science & Business Media.
Waldman, T. & Harel, E. (2015). Participating in a technology enhanced internationalization project to promote students’ foreign language motivation. In D. Schwarzer (Ed.), Internationalizing teacher education: successes and challenges within domestic and international contexts. Lexington Books: New Jersey.
Waldman, T., Harel, E., Schwab, G. (2016). Getting their feet wet: Trainee EFL teachers in Germany and Israel collaborate online to promote their telecollaboration competence through experiential learning. In: S. Jager / M. Kurek / B. O'Rourke (eds.), New directions in telecollaborative research and practice: selected papers from the second conference on telecollaboration in higher education (pp. 179-184). Dublin: Research-publishing.net.
Waldman, T. / Schwab, G. / Harel, E. (2019). Extended Telecollaboration Practice (ETP) in Teacher Education: Towards Pluricultural and Plurilingual Proficiency. In: European Journal of Language Policy/ Revue européenne de politique linguistique, on the subject of Languages and international virtual exchange (special edition). 11(2), pp. 167-185.
Warschauer, M. (Ed.). (1996). Telecollaboration in foreign language learning: proceedings of the Hawaii Symposium (Vol. 12). Natl Foreign Lg Resource Ctr.
Wei, L., & Martin, P. (2009). Conflicts and tensions in classroom codeswitching: an introduction. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 12(2), 117-122.
Wells, G., & Bridges, A. (1981). Learning through interaction: volume 1: the study of language development (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.
Young, R. F. (2014). What is interactional competence? AL Forum: The Newsletter of the Applied Linguistics Interest Section, January 2014, 2–4. September
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 TESOL in Context
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
